Trail cameras take serial pictures from a fixed viewpoint and lend themselves to making composites of images recorded at different times. These are particularly useful in showing relative sizes, as in the image above which comes from a couple of years ago.
The photo below is recent and is made from fitting together three slices of the same view with subjects that didn't overlap. It shows a comparison of the sizes of an otter, an American mink and a stoat, three distantly related species.
The next one compares the mink and the stoat on a different camera, the size difference somewhat exaggerated by the different distance from the camera.
In the examples above the joints between different photos have been removed for effect but I usually leave them to make the point that it is a composite and not a trick photo. The next three photos from the "weasel box" in my garden compare the sizes of a female stoat (L) with a female weasel in the first two and a male weasel in the third. They also show fairly dramatically the size difference between male and female weasels.
These also show female (L) and male (R) weasels on different visits to the box. The male is twice the weight of the female.
The last example compares male stoat (weighing 350g), female stoat (250g), male weasel (120g) and female weasel (60g).
I notice that all the animals above are mustelids, perhaps because they are frequent targets of my cameras but also because size comparisons of related species are particularly useful. I'll see if I can come up with something similar for smaller mammals.